The Why and Why Not of User Participation in IOS Development

نویسنده

  • Angèle L. M. Cavaye
چکیده

Development This paper argues that user participation can enhance the development of interorganisational systems (10s). Under certain circumstances participation may be particularly desirable or may be facilitated; other circumstances make participation seemingly less important or inhibit participation. Such contingencies for partlclpatlon during IOS development are identified and-described. When interorganisational systems (10s) are developed, the intention is that these systems are adopted by users outside the initiating organisation. Such users may b e private individuals (for instance , users of Internet or of automated teller machines) or may be organisations (for instance, users of order entry systems or corporatecash management systems). implementation of IOS and system uptake by intended users is not necessarily easy or successful. There are a number of measures and practices which organisations can employ to enhance implementation. Some of these (like large-scale marketing of the system) are used aftera system has been developed, at a time when the IOS is ready to be offered to potential users. It is also possible to take a proactive stance towards facilitating implementation and encouraging adoption of the IOS by users; by seeking participation of intended users during the development process, the opportunity is created to consider potential implementation problems before the IOS has been built. What Is 'User participation in IOS Development' ? Participation of intended users during development of a system refers to the practice of involving users in activities during the development process. Such participation should not just take place during testing of the system, but participation should allow users to help shape the system by collaborating during the problem definition phase and the specification phase of development. Participation is aimed at building asystem which is acceptable to intended users and this in turn should facilitate implementation and encourage adoption and use of the system by the intended user group. Participation in the IOS context involves gathering together representatives of various interest groups from outside the organisation before starting actual development and seeking active involvement of those users during the development process. In this way, the IOS is developed with input and (hopefully) with the consensus of intended users which, if carried out correctly, should ensure that the concept and the final design of the IOS take account of various interests. When the IOS addresses intended users' needs and interests, the system is more likely to be accepted and used by the intended users. While the argument in …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Your Call Could not be Completed as Dialled: Why Truth Does not Speak to Power In Global Health; Comment on “Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health”

This article contends that legitimacy in the exercise of power comes from the consent of those subject to it. In global health, this implies that the participation of poor country citizens is required for the legitimacy of major actors and institutions. But a review of institutions and processes suggests that this participation is limited or absent. Particularly because of the complex political...

متن کامل

Decentralisation and Health Services Delivery in 4 Districts in Tanzania: How and Why Does the Use of Decision Space Vary Across Districts?

Background Decentralisation in the health sector has been promoted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for many years. Inherently, decentralisation grants decision-making space to local level authorities over different functions such as: finance, human resources, service organization, and governance. However, there is paucity of studies which have assessed the actual use of decisi...

متن کامل

Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Dukhanin and colleagues’ taxonomy of metrics for patient engagement at the organizational and system levels has great potential for supporting more careful and useful evaluations of this ever-growing phenomenon. This commentary highlights the central importance to the taxonomy of metrics assessing the extent of meaningful participation in decision-making by patients, consumers and community mem...

متن کامل

A Critical Study of the Views on the Why of Not Mentioning Uli `lamr as the Source of Conflict in the Verse 59 Nias

The present descriptive-analytic research has examined and interpreted the commentators' view on the why of not mentioning Uli `lamr as a source of conflict resolution in the verse 59 of Sura Nisa. In various respects, some have considered lack of innocence as the reason for not mentioning them as a source of dispute resolution, some view the people`s obligation in following the first part of t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Electronic Markets

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1995